How To Reach 'america'?

[Guest]

REAL FIRST HAND experience!

Simulator or no simulator, I've had my hand on the joystick! Only in the final Test of Fire you need to take off from a real-life runway, and keep the enemy away from harassing our blue skies!

Have you even been in a fighter air craft before?

It's like I told you. You are free to doubt my words, but you won't laugh if you are in one of those enemy MIGs!

Simulations can give you a good idea of what the thing is about but it is not actually flying an Fighter Jet. Fighter Jets hava a whole ton of controls and buttons. You have to know how to use those controls, when to push the buttons and what they do. (I should know, my uncle who is in the Untied States Air Force has shown me some Fighter Jets and they are very complicated.) In my experience the only way to thourlghly learn something is to do it.

Simulations are just that, simulations. When you actually do something it is usually different than the simulation because new situations always come up. It's like when I do racing simulations. Doing the simulation was easy, all I had to do was press a button and move the control stick. Driving a reall car is nothing like that thought. When really driving you have to use a steering weel, know how to use the accelarator and the break, you have to know how to use the windshield wipers, lights, bright lights, how to turn the inside lights on and many many other things. The simulation did all that for me but in real life I have to do it myself.

[No, serious?]

How wonderfull this America might be, it is now in great danger - America is being destroyed by "mexicans". Or so is it according to some who have supposedly reached America.
How these vandals are attackting is unknown. Some say they themselves have reached America, however such unbelivers could do that!

I tried to tell you but you just never listen. What country is by Mexico? The United States of America. Mexico is below America and Canada is above. There are a lot of mexican people in the south of the USA because it is next to mexico.

If niilo hadn't taken down my map I posted you would be able to look at what I am talking about.

http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbo...th_america.html This is from the CIA World Factbook.

See Mexico is below, America (USA) is in the middle and Canada is above.

To be honest, Mexico should be considered CENTRAL AMERICA, to be precise in terms of geographical balance, not North. The fact that you wish it to be friends with US, and colaborate on the draconian commerce pacts US presses on others, and put it together with the US and Canada, on North America is the only fact that make it belong to CENTRAL America.

I dont know what you have against Central America, by the way, take for instance Panamá: You nearly wiped that country off the map when you invaded it to make Panama Channel, keeping the country divided by a demilitraized zone for years. Of course, by the US mind, demilitarized means: WE keep bases and soldiers everywhere, to ensure that YOU, the legitimate country's government don't. And dont make me start on Nicaragua, or Guatemala    


 

[HerranRuoska]

How wonderfull this America might be, it is now in great danger - America is being destroyed by "mexicans". Or so is it according to some who have supposedly reached America.
How these vandals are attackting is unknown. Some say they themselves have reached America, however such unbelivers could do that!

I tried to tell you but you just never listen. What country is by Mexico? The United States of America. Mexico is below America and Canada is above. There are a lot of mexican people in the south of the USA because it is next to mexico.

If niilo hadn't taken down my map I posted you would be able to look at what I am talking about.

http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbo...th_america.html This is from the CIA World Factbook.

See Mexico is below, America (USA) is in the middle and Canada is above.

To be honest, Mexico should be considered CENTRAL AMERICA, to be precise in terms of geographical balance, not North. The fact that you wish it to be friends with US, and colaborate on the draconian commerce pacts US presses on others, and put it together with the US and Canada, on North America is the only fact that make it belong to CENTRAL America.

I dont know what you have against Central America, by the way, take for instance Panamá: You nearly wiped that country off the map when you invaded it to make Panama Channel, keeping the country divided by a demilitraized zone for years. Of course, by the US mind, demilitarized means: WE keep bases and soldiers everywhere, to ensure that YOU, the legitimate country's government don't. And dont make me start on Nicaragua, or Guatemala    

It is suctch a joy joy joy in ouor hearts to now tha t that kreat Kuntery Ameriga kills and axterminates Gommunist catholich untermenschen in sutch blages as Kuate maala ant Akancacua. Niilolujaa niilolujaa Niilolujaa Niilolujaa  

[Guest]

To be honest, Mexico should be considered CENTRAL AMERICA, to be precise in terms of geographical balance, not North. The fact that you wish it to be friends with US, and colaborate on the draconian commerce pacts US presses on others, and put it together with the US and Canada, on North America is the only fact that make it belong to CENTRAL America.

I dont know what you have against Central America, by the way, take for instance Panamá: You nearly wiped that country off the map when you invaded it to make Panama Channel, keeping the country divided by a demilitraized zone for years. Of course, by the US mind, demilitarized means: WE keep bases and soldiers everywhere, to ensure that YOU, the legitimate country's government don't. And dont make me start on Nicaragua, or Guatemala    

Belize, Guatemala,  El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and Panama are Central America. Mexico is not, Mexico is North America. Look it up on Google if you think i'm wrong.

What make you think we have anything against Central America? I wasn't even born when they where doing things to Panama. Don't get mad at the people for what our presidents do. We only have say in what happens to a point, but after that point the government does what it wants.

[Guest]

To be honest, Mexico should be considered CENTRAL AMERICA, to be precise in terms of geographical balance, not North. The fact that you wish it to be friends with US, and colaborate on the draconian commerce pacts US presses on others, and put it together with the US and Canada, on North America is the only fact that make it belong to CENTRAL America.

I dont know what you have against Central America, by the way, take for instance Panamá: You nearly wiped that country off the map when you invaded it to make Panama Channel, keeping the country divided by a demilitraized zone for years. Of course, by the US mind, demilitarized means: WE keep bases and soldiers everywhere, to ensure that YOU, the legitimate country's government don't. And dont make me start on Nicaragua, or Guatemala    

Belize, Guatemala,  El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and Panama are Central America. Mexico is not, Mexico is North America. Look it up on Google if you think i'm wrong.

What make you think we have anything against Central America? I wasn't even born when they where doing things to Panama. Don't get mad at the people for what our presidents do. We only have say in what happens to a point, but after that point the government does what it wants.

As for Mexico, I know, I said should, and I said nothing against the people, only against US, the institution that comprises the government

[Follower of NP]

All this won't help me to reach america any closer

[Guest]

All this won't help me to reach america any closer

Well if you can't find America by now then maybe you just arn't suppost to know where it is.

[LichGoat]

How can you reach America. Only SERIOUS replies now, please!

1. Create a sense of misguided patriotism and create a common enemy which threatens your way of life to fuel that fire.

2. Create a state of paranoia and fear, which keeps the populace looking for the daggers aimed for the back, so they won't see the daggers coming from the front.

3. Allow elected officials to urine all over your constitution.

[2m2]

I'm a little disapponted that we have those F-18 Hornets in Finland, and not the F-16:s. But at least they choosed to buy the jets from the US. Finnish leaders were in the war against terrorism way back in the nineties, before the war on terror was IN and POP. Worst choice would have been french (poo-poo) Mirages. In that case we Finns would have deserved to get shot for being deserters from the war on terror, like the french. Every good Republican's motto is "Hang the French. ;-)" The smiley included, it's so funny. The swedish candidate was really funny too, their jet rarely rose up in the air, and it if did, it very soon crashed in the middle of Stockholm. Unfortunately, our good friendship and mutual helping ally, Soviet Union went belly up, and we coudn't buy the very best jets, the MiG-29.
 

[2m2]

They KNOW America would nuke ANY country that attacked us.

Dear "Guest". There is only one (thingy) big enough to keep going on saying things like that, and that is you. Please come out of the closet, (thingy) Cheney! Applause, everyone! You are welcome to register yourself here with your real name.
I hear that your children are homos. But I have no problem with that. I am sure that all citizens of the US are homos. And if all US citizens are not homos, I would think you have a very funny way of giving citizenships, but I wouldn't be surprised.
Think of Latin America, not Greek Wedding.

PS. I understand perfectly, if a man of your type pictures himself as a 16 year old schoolgirl.
 

[Guest]

They KNOW America would nuke ANY country that attacked us.

Dear "Guest". There is only one (thingy) big enough to keep going on saying things like that, and that is you. Please come out of the closet, (thingy) Cheney! Applause, everyone! You are welcome to register yourself here with your real name.
I hear that your children are homos. But I have no problem with that. I am sure that all citizens of the US are homos. And if all US citizens are not homos, I would think you have a very funny way of giving citizenships, but I wouldn't be surprised.
Think of Latin America, not Greek Wedding.

PS. I understand perfectly, if a man of your type pictures himself as a 16 year old schoolgirl.

Do you really think Cheney would come onto this website? Sorry but you are talking to a 16 year old girl, nothing more nothing less. Why would you think I was Cheney anyway? If all U.S. citizens where homo(the s-word)uals then we would have Homosexual marriage, but we don't.

[2m2]

If all U.S. citizens where homo(the s-word)uals then we would have Homosexual marriage, but we don't.

Stop thinking about (the s-word) now for a moment, will you! Do you still not accept LATIN America, but you are stuck in the idea of GREEK HOMO Weddings?

[David Deegan]

I find this to be highly hilarious, because you obviously don't read the king james version bible you are a backslidden joker, the bible warns the readers of wolves in sheeps clothing.  You claim that you are not stupid enough to believe a country could be lead by a bush, and yet if you READ the BIBLE you would know that moses was lead through the desert, leading the entire jewish populace, basically the future israel, through a burning bush... and much vaguer concepts.  So in conclusion if you are going to claim to be so well read on your bible, and attempt to continue these hilarities as saying no americas exist, the only thing it really proves is that you not only have no grasp of the book you swear to be reading, but you have no grasp of reality either.

  Spend less time on the internet, read your bible, and pray. Humans are sinful, it was why Jesus died for us, you should not rely on a sinful creature to lead your lives, you NEED to CONTACT GOD via the HOLY SPIRIT, which exists in all lhumans, it is our guide an imprint of the hand of god which was left from our simply being touched by him in birth.  Abraham pointed this out through all of the stories left behind of him.  You are all building the tower of babel.

  And finally, MATRIMONIAL LESBIANISM IS NOT HOLY.  The Bible states that anything is sanctified in the marriage bed, The MARRIAGE BED, this consists of 2 words, Marriage- The binding of TWO people together in a holy activity. And Bed- a place of rest slumber or reproduction.  Therefor your blashpemy about Sanctified Lesbianism is Heretical.  I don't need to flame you or judge you as you so easily judge people asheretics and witches.  You see the bible also says let he who is without sin cast the first stone.  I will let god be the one to judge you, what he does will be far worse than what I could ever do.    

[Niilo Paasivirta]

You claim that you are not stupid enough to believe a country could be lead by a bush

I don't understand what you mean. United States is currently lead by George Bush, who is a good christian! So a country can definitely be lead by Bush.

And finally, MATRIMONIAL LESBIANISM IS NOT HOLY.  The Bible states that anything is sanctified in the marriage bed, The MARRIAGE BED, this consists of 2 words, Marriage- The binding of TWO people together in a holy activity. And Bed- a place of rest slumber or reproduction.

So you haven't read the Bible? Many of the men in the Bible have several wives!

And lesbianism is definitely a horrible sin! We all agree on that.

But it is not lesbianism at all when man's wives pleasure their husband with a little "action". That is merely for the pleasure of their legal husband. Nothing sinful there, all happens within holy matrimony. This must not even be called "lesbianism"!

[bengel]

You're right about that, Np, and now it is time to confront our little David with his real overwhelming GOLIATH, the truth.

Read the new testament in the language in which it was written, translations are always transformations. The 4 gospels that we are allowed to read only speak of a "parakleitos", not of a "holy spirit". The only Aramaic word inside the original Greek texts is "santa". E Sjatan, to be exact. When Jesus is not being portrayed within mythology or metaphor, he directs the word "santa" directly towards a human being, f.e. Peter (vade retro santanas, scandalum es mihi - in Latin). So, I'm sorry Hollywood, no demons in real (after)life. The Parakleitos is the defender of the poor, sick, crippled, marginalized, prostitutes and dissidents of the Jewish - or any - "old law". Romans didn't like that kind of slave morality. So they crucified him, among 3000 others within their Empire that day. Every day, about 3000 villains were crucified! Now, what is so special about Jesus' crucifixion, that a religion became its offspring? Jesus has been the only one of which we have a written account, who was not found guilty by his executioners. Since Pilate washed his hands, and merely complied to the will of the Jewish Pharisee and Zelote mob. The first victim to be knowingly killed unguilty. Of course, the Catholic church didn't understand this, thanks to Paul, the Roman citizen Jew murderer, who thought that Jesus' death was a "traditional" sacrifice ("he died for the sins of the world"). This thought pattern opened the way towards "violence in the name of our lord Jesus", as our European history clearly shows. Too bad! Jesus merely came to reveal the "things hidden since the foundation of the world". And paid for it with his life. Some things are probably better left unspoken...